Nowak's Statements On Paunovic Create More Questions Than Answers
Twitter, Facebook and the Brotherly Game exploded with comments about Piotr Nowak, the Philadelphia Union's head coach, deciding to start newly signed striker and central attacking midfielder Veljko Paunovic against the Vancouver Whitecaps on Saturday night. Those comments ranged from interest in seeing what the 33-year-old can do to criticizing the Union's technical staff for playing Paunovic over the team's leading scorer Danny Mwanga.
Union head coach Piotr Nowak had the following to say about Paunovic's first start for the team:
"We'll see how he will adjust to the speed of the game, and of course he's not match fit." Nowak also added, "I think that for the 60 minutes we prescribed for him in this game, he did pretty well. You can see that he still needs match fitness, but I think it was a good chance for him."
If a player isn't match fit, then why is he playing, let alone starting for a team that only needed a single point to move into sole possession of first place in the Eastern Conference? At 67% match fitness (the team felt he could only go 60 minutes of a 90 minute game, or two thirds of the total), does it make sense to start any player in any league on any team?
Nowak's non-chalant attitude about starting Paunovic at a fitness level that does not hold up for a full game is appalling. Danny Mwanga once again sat on the Union's bench to start the game. There has yet to be any explanation from the technical staff as to why Mwanga continues to be looked over for a starting role in 2010. All the former number one overall pick has done is lead the team in goals and continued to create through some great runs in open play in the games he's been involved in.
Paunovic, for what it's worth, managed to keep playing soccer during his two plus year absence from professional soccer by playing in a 'top' indoor soccer league with Atletico Madrid in Spain. His time was mostly served by coaching, which shows that other than his trial with the New York Red Bulls in 2009, and of course his trial with the Union that lead to his signing, Paunovic wasn't fully focused on trying to do all the necessary things to stay in full soccer shape.
That's not to knock Paunovic in the least. He had a good career in Europe, which is shown not only by his statistics, but also by the quality of the teams he played with - mostly in Spain's top league, La Liga. It's just that Nowak seems to consistently want to outsmart the opposing technical staff with a lot of his moves, but in reality he tends to outsmart himself. It's indicative of Nowak's long history in MLS coaching.
Moves like starting a 33-year-old who hasn't played in over two years instead of a leading scorer who is supposed to be the future of the franchise aren't unusual within Nowak's coaching career. Nowak has done a fantastic job with every team he has dealt with in MLS, but he's made some major mistakes along the way, even while he was winning.
Back during Nowak's time with DC United, he chose to sit Ben Olsen, current the United head coach. Olsen at the time was a stalwart for the team and part of the reason that Nowak had success. The next couple of games were disastrous for the team, as Nowak had decided to start a recently acquired player, who was much older than Olsen. The situation is an almost perfect parallel to Nowak's apparent snub of Mwanga, although the Union have only lost one game directly because of such a coaching action.
It's frustrating to see such a young talent forced to the bench in favor of a Lazy Susan approach to figuring out a starting XI.
Eli Pearlman-Storch of the Philly Soccer Page had the following to say today about this very subject:
Nowak was quick to point out that Paunovic is still working his way back to full match fitness.
I am quick to point out that maybe he should have spent more than one subpar game in the reserves before being thrust into the starting lineup.
Paunovic shouldn't be playing at all. Yet, if he MUST play, doesn't logic dictate that you give him 20 minutes in the second half to evaluate his performance level and to see if he has anything left with which to provide a spark? Then again, this is clearly not a team based on logic. If it was, I wouldn't even know who Paunovic was.
Man, I wish I didn't know who Paunovic was. Talk about blissful ignorance. If I didn't know the name Paunovic, I'd probably be writing about a Union victory and the buzzsaw that Sporting Kansas City was about to walk into. Instead, I'm sitting here writing about this crap.
I am on record saying that if Paunovic gets minutes ahead of either Danny Mwanga or Jack McInerney then the Union are in big trouble. I stand by that and say again, The Union are now in big trouble. When Carlos Ruiz arrived in Philadelphia he at least had a strong pedigree for scoring goals in MLS and, while the Greek league is not considered amongst Europe's elite, it is still a strong league, one in which he was earning valuable minutes.
I'm with the Human Storch. Sacrificing the youth movement for what appears to be a pick-and-play managerial technique is not the way that the Union were last year or this year. Enough is enough. Stop messing with a good thing. The age old phrase is "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." Was a team that was 2-0-2 in its last four, with the two draws coming against Real Salt Lake and the Colorado Rapids, in need of such a drastic move up front?
In the words of one of the Brotherly Game's shirts, "Me Wanna Mwanga."
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I will write an apology on tBG if Paunovic starts and scores a goal.
Managing Editor for Brotherly Game, SBNation's Philadelphia Union blog and contributor for SBN Philly. // @scottdkessler
"College is only 4 years, but the Eagles are for life." - Ironhank
Why would you write an apology if a player does what he’s supposed to do as a professional? If you believe his starting cost the Union three points in Vancouver (something I agree with) and he makes a real contribution toward the Union taking three points against KC, the original point remains true.
Fair enough.
I don’t want to come off as hating the guy versus hating his usage per the technical staff’s approach.
Managing Editor for Brotherly Game, SBNation's Philadelphia Union blog and contributor for SBN Philly. // @scottdkessler
"College is only 4 years, but the Eagles are for life." - Ironhank
by Scott Kessler on Jun 22, 2011 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions
There's a difference
..between “not knocking Paunovic”, although starting a hashtag of #oldserbian sounds like knocking and not supporting, and calling out Nowak.
I agree Paunovic did not play well. I was puzzled he was a good 20 yard behind Le Toux for most of the match. He’s not there yet. However, that’s not his fault. If he was good enough to sign, then it’s the coaching and technical staff’s job to make sure he’s ready physically and tactically.
Nowak, on the other hand, is where all this silliness stems from. When the rumor of the signing and the other Ruiz to Mexico rumor came out, it almost made sense. I say almost, because I’m not sure yet what kind of ownership group we have. It’s apparent we don’t have the deep pockets of LA or NY, cause Feilhaber would probably be in blue and gold. I feel like this is the Phillies, circa 2004. We’re starting to win with Jon Lieber, but at some point we’re going to need some help. If we’re so tight to a budget (and I’m not talking cap here but the dollars you can go over or allocation money plays), the Paunovic signing reeks of that 3am last call at the bar when you throw a few crumpled dollars on the bar and say “What can I get for this?”. I’m not blaming Nowak for signing him, but he made a decision to play him.
I’m also not convinced that the “kids” need to play. There maybe something in practice that we don’t see with Mwanga. Is he undisciplined? Does he miss assignments? Was the benching a message? Was the signing a message to Jack to step up his game? I know, I know, they will only improve by playing. But what’s happening in practice and the reserve league games that’s not showcasing their skills? Yeah, Paunovic was apparently not impressive, but was Jack? Do you think Roger Torres could play 90? I don’t. They are still learning the game, and need to learn to play bigger. Torres gets knocked off the ball by everyone. Not a great trait for an offensive midfielder.
I’m not ready to cry a river yet over this team. It’s midway through year 2 and they sit 1 point out of first. Now if they crap the pitch tonight, that’s another story. We’ve seen the potential, we just need to better understand the “why” of some of these personnel decisions.
I'll try to answer all of your points (good response).
1. There is a difference and the intent of the article was not to attack Paunovic as a person, which is what I feel some people think the Paunovic comes down to. It’s a criticism of Nowak’s managerial choices.
2. You’re correct that it’s not Paunovic’s fault entirely. The coaching staff is wholly responsible for the line ups and the fitness levels of the players that are put out on the pitch.
3. Boy do I like that Phillies analogy. This really does seem like that team. It has most of the parts needed to be a top player, but lacks certain components.
4. Do all the kids need to play? No. McInerney is clearly best served as a super sub, as is Torres. Neither are as effective from the get go as they are going against tiring opponents. We don’t know what happened in practice, but what we do know is what we saw out on the field. That’s all we can comment on. My feeling is that you don’t play someone whatsoever if you’re so disappointed in his practices that you decide (again) to bench him, especially with McInerney sitting on the bench next to him. Nowak somewhat admitted that Mwanga was necessary to the good of the offense by subbing him on in the 59th.
5. My thoughts exactly. It’s “Why?” more than “WTF?”
Managing Editor for Brotherly Game, SBNation's Philadelphia Union blog and contributor for SBN Philly. // @scottdkessler
"College is only 4 years, but the Eagles are for life." - Ironhank
by Scott Kessler on Jun 22, 2011 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Starting Paunovic was the reason we lost against Vancouver? If only it could be boiled down to something that so simple ..
Of course it wasn't.
But it was of the major ones, can we agree on that?
Managing Editor for Brotherly Game, SBNation's Philadelphia Union blog and contributor for SBN Philly. // @scottdkessler
"College is only 4 years, but the Eagles are for life." - Ironhank
by Scott Kessler on Jun 22, 2011 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions
I think all of the changes at the same time made it feel more like pre-season match. Frankly, I thought Migs looked more lost.
All of that combined with how hard everyone’s touches looked bouncing around that turf makes the argument stronger that no changes should have been made. Unless because of Paunovic’s recent play in a “top indoor” league was some sort of tactical nod to the turf.
IDK, I’ve stopped trying to figure it out and am starting to think playing in the NW is not good for the U.
If Mwanga is on for Paunovic and Farfan on for Migz...
right there I think the game is completely different. All Nowak had to do was not go back to the two DM system that he hadn’t been using during the 2-0-2 undefeated streak and choose to not give Paunovic a starting role. What would have been wrong with Paunovic coming on as a substitute?
Managing Editor for Brotherly Game, SBNation's Philadelphia Union blog and contributor for SBN Philly. // @scottdkessler
"College is only 4 years, but the Eagles are for life." - Ironhank
by Scott Kessler on Jun 22, 2011 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Im not sure Paunovic is the reason we lost but not starting Mwanga week in and week out seems crazy as does pairing Seba with an attacking mid type forward as opposed to a hold up, bump with the opposing CBs and make diagonal runs forward.
My friend who watches probably 5 or 6 games a season summed it up best when he asked me after the Vancouver game, “John, why do the Union bring there best player on as a sub?” I think that is how all of us feel when Petr decides to get cute and play MOF at CM, Stahl at CB, Mwanga at AM, Mwanga on the bench, Seba as a winger and the Farfans at LB.
Your second paragraph’s last sentence is the whole “outsmarting himself” thing that Nowak does.
Managing Editor for Brotherly Game, SBNation's Philadelphia Union blog and contributor for SBN Philly. // @scottdkessler
"College is only 4 years, but the Eagles are for life." - Ironhank
by Scott Kessler on Jun 22, 2011 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions

by 

















