Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Should Encourage Juan Mata

Union are "dirty players"

http://blog.chron.com/soccer/2011/11/dynamo-must-keep-cool-against-dirty-union/

Waa Waa Waa the Union are dirty players... I seriously considered not posting this for the sheer fact that I don't want to drive this guy's blog hits up any more than they already are... But I suppose it is relevant and worth discussing, even if I think its little more than whining from an author with little else to write about. 

Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Philadelphia Union had two or three fouls last game that could have been red cards without much argument

Not saying the Union are a dirty team, but watching Sunday’s game, it is not hard to see where one might get that notion.

Editor at SB Nation's Philadelphia Union blog, The Brotherly Game. Follow me on Twitter.

by Justin F. on Nov 2, 2011 10:15 PM EDT reply actions  

the only really dirty play i noticed though was Farfan’s kick to the head, and i think there was another one where one of our players may have kicked some or stepped on someone while they were on the ground like Thiery Henry. (this might have been another game i watched)

by Rhayes on Nov 3, 2011 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

And it could have easily been a red card.

Editor at SB Nation's Philadelphia Union blog, The Brotherly Game. Follow me on Twitter.

by Justin F. on Nov 3, 2011 2:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

The difference

is that the Union had several fouls, not that they got away with, but that were penalised less harshly than the opponent felt it deserved.

Houston on the other hand got one goal on an uncalled offsides, and was spared another on an uncalled handball. I think their sore winner perspective is coming from the knowledge that the ref stole the game for them when he didn’t call that handball.

Flyers, Phillies, Union, Eagles, Phantoms, Wings.

by Pelti on Nov 3, 2011 9:17 AM EDT reply actions  

Thanks to ESPN's shoddy production and lack of quality replays

The best you can say about both of those calls is they are inconclusive. Specifically on the alleged offside, there is never an angle that lines up straight with the defensive line nor does ESPN super-impose a line at any point to tell one way or the other.

On the handball, there was only one replay, and the angle we got was with Brad Davis’s back to the ball, so, you cannot conclusively say that was a handball. Jair Marrufo had a better view than anyone of that play and did not make a call. Davis’s arm is in an unnatural position, yes, and the ball did appear to hit Davis, but exactly where it hit him is impossible to conclude, again, thanks to ESPN’s shoddy production.

Editor at SB Nation's Philadelphia Union blog, The Brotherly Game. Follow me on Twitter.

by Justin F. on Nov 3, 2011 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

http://assets.sbnation.com/assets/774245/CarrOffside_01.jpg

I disagree. Look at the mow-striping on the field. No union player is more than halfway across the stripe, the Dynamo player is.

Flyers, Phillies, Union, Eagles, Phantoms, Wings.

by Pelti on Nov 3, 2011 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

You cannot definitively say for sure where on the pitch Calen Carr is with this camera angle

Depth perception becomes a major problem, especially as Calen Carr’s legs and feet are blocked out of view by the Union player. You cannot definitively determine where on the pitch Carr is without seeing his legs and his feet. It’s a bad angle and you can’t even see the player’s feet to make an attempt to line it up or technologically impose a line on the play. From this angle, it is impossible to tell.

Editor at SB Nation's Philadelphia Union blog, The Brotherly Game. Follow me on Twitter.

by Justin F. on Nov 3, 2011 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Depth perception isn’t a problem when they are standing between 2 parallel lines. It’s pretty absurd to say “you can’t see his feet”, when the reason for that is because he’s behind the defender.

Flyers, Phillies, Union, Eagles, Phantoms, Wings.

by Pelti on Nov 3, 2011 2:05 PM EDT reply actions  

well...

I do think it was offside, but I also acknowledge that I’m totally biased. That said…

You can see one of his feet. You can see one of his creamsicle socks right next to Califf’s feet. That, to me, isn’t an issue in this image.

What is an issue, though, is the position of the Union defender at the top of the screen (it looks sort of like Valdes, but I can’t quite tell). He might be even with Carr. He might be a tad bit behind. It’s hard to tell from the angle.

All that said… I think it’s laughable that ESPN can’t get the right camera angle. All it takes is that camera on a wire they use at NFL games, with the wire strung even with the sideline. Keep the camera level with the last defender, and you always have the perfect replay angle to show.

by Zherog on Nov 3, 2011 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

okay this is infurating

How many times must it be said that you cannot definitively tell it was offsides. Fact of the matter: That angle is inconclusive. Re-watching the goal on ESPN and trying to put all the angles together, it is at best inconclusively, and at worst onside. Taylor Twellman called it onside during the broadcast. There is just no evidence that Carr’s goal was offside, no matter what you want to believe. People want it to be offside. It’s easier to blame the ref than Nowak’s poor tactics or poor play, but FACT: that angle is not conducive for determining offside. No angle that ESPN showed is.

I do agree that it is laughable that ESPN and MLS can’t do better than this.

Editor at SB Nation's Philadelphia Union blog, The Brotherly Game. Follow me on Twitter.

by Justin F. on Nov 3, 2011 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

might consider re-reading

I said the screen shot wasn’t definitive. I said it’s not clear where Carr is in relation to the Union defenders.

I thought it was offside, based on what I saw live. But nowhere in my post did I say the replay or the screen shot was clear proof. Quite the opposite.

by Zherog on Nov 3, 2011 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

There are three other defenders, only one of which you say with a fair amount of confidence Carr is behind.

The picture is blurry so I can’t make out who it is, but starting from the left, you cannot say for certain that Carr is behind the defender all the way on the left side of the pic and the 3rd from the left. The fact of the matter is it is a bad angle and whether or not is is offside is inconclusive. If you think this angle conclusively shows offside, you are nothing short of delusional. That’s just the fact of the matter. Deal with it.

Editor at SB Nation's Philadelphia Union blog, The Brotherly Game. Follow me on Twitter.

by Justin F. on Nov 3, 2011 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

The Brotherly Game is a blog about the Philadelphia Union.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
An Open Letter to the Philadelphia Union
283470_10150370877978747_582168746_10242305_6959890_n_small
Nowak By The Numbers
Small
Game 9 Thoughts: Mooo
Le_toux_small
Screwing Around
Small
Friendly Game, Friendly Thoughts
Small
Game 8 Thoughts
Le_toux_small
No Creative Title Necessary.. its just BAD
Small
Game 7 Thoughts from the Soccer Newb
Small
Game 6 Thoughts from the Soccer Newb
Small
Chivas Match: Your Lineup and Strategy

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Brotherlygame-xl_small kyleshank

New_twitter_pic_small Scott Kessler

Editor

Newavatar14_small Justin F.

Small Ben Feldman

Writer

47006_jj_small DanyS

P10103302_small mk_27

207998_1939257889670_1489103314_32220394_5403546_n_small Jersha

Me_longbeard_small Julian Brown

Yeager_small atomicruckus

Small Section107RowA

312159_307747112577629_100000270290655_1272643_2101793950_n_small tonyunion2010

Moderator

Small Buzzkill_Ed