The State of Major League Soccer on Television: The Situation Nationally
As Major League Soccer enters its sixteenth season, it is reaching an impasse. In the last two years, it has added teams in large markets with Seattle and Philadelphia. This year, it adds two more major markets in Portland and Vancouver, and is scheduled to bring in Montreal for 2012. Average attendance across the league continues to slowly but steadily increase. But its position in what has become the most important venue in the history of professional sports, television, leaves much to be desired, and there appears to be no easy solution.
In this four part series, we will discuss (a) the current state of Major League Soccer on television in the United States nationally, (b) the current state of Major League Soccer's regional broadcasts (c) what should be the ultimate end goal for MLS, regardless of whether that takes place five years in the future, thirty years in the future, never or next month and (d) how to get from the current position to the end goal.
After the jump, we'll dive in head first into the status of national MLS television deals.
As you well know, MLS matches have been shown nationally in English across the ESPN family of networks (including ABC at various times) since the league's inception, and on Fox Soccer Channel since 2003. The league also has longstanding broadcast deals with Univision and its sub-channels Galavisión and TeleFutura to broadcast MLS matches nationally in Spanish. On a given week, ESPN will usually air a Thursday or Friday night match while Fox Soccer Channel will air either one or two matches throughout Saturday or Sunday night. TeleFutura holds exclusive Spanish rights to one regular season match per week on Saturday afternoon at 4 PM Eastern time, but because they only hold the exclusive Spanish rights to that match, the two teams involved in the match are allowed to air local broadcasts in English; the match is still considered "nationally-televised," however, and is not available on the league's DirectKick or MatchDay Live packages. When the playoffs begin, each and every postseason match is televised by one of the league's national partners. ESPN picks up two of the four opening round series, while Fox Soccer Channel and TeleFutura each pick up one (like with regular season TeleFutura telecasts, they only hold exclusive rights for Spanish, so the regional broadcasters of the two teams involved are allowed to pick up the English rights in their teams' markets for the two matches in the series), with Fox Soccer Channel and ESPN each exclusively televising a Conference Final match and ESPN and TeleFutura televising that year's MLS Cup. As a quick sidenote, the CBC and GolTV Canada do have deals with MLS, but they have more to do with airing Toronto FC matches than trying to provide national MLS coverage, though that may change with the welcoming of Vancouver and soon Montreal, and that will be discussed in detail in a future segment of this series. Along the same lines, it should be noted that TSN in Canada televises MLS Cup and GolTV Canada picks up the MLS All-Star Game.
The league's contract with ESPN pays them an average of $8.5 million per year through 2014, and includes rights to many U.S. Men's National Team matches. It's probably fair to say that despite declining ratings on ESPN, MLS commissioner Don Garber is very happy with the amount of exposure his league gets even through its small amount of coverage across the network. Univision's contract with the league also ends in 2014. The league's contract with Fox Soccer Channel, though, which has been paying the league at a rate of $3 million per year, expired at the end of the 2010 season.
As much as ratings have flatlined, if not dropped, over the past couple of seasons, MLS is not without options. Fox Soccer Channel, which is not a standard cable station nationwide, has what can only be described as a sub-par production quality on their telecasts. In fact, it's probably not unreasonable to call them a Mickey Mouse operation. Most of their viewership on a weekly basis comes from rebroadcasting British feeds of English Premier League matches on the weekends, and their HD coverage is spotty, to say the least. In fact, to get Fox Soccer Channel on Comcast cable systems requires subscribing to a $6 per month package, and even then you don't get the channel in HD.
During negotiations, Fox has reasonably offered to increase their annual fee to $7 million per year, but according to SportsBusiness Journal's John Ourand, MLS is trying to up the ante to $20 million a year, which would be far and away the league's most valuable media deal in its relatively short history. Why does MLS feel comfortable effectively giving Fox an ultimatum? Two reasons: Fox's relative lack of programming during the EPL and UEFA offseasons, and the threat of Versus swooping in and purchasing this package of games away from Fox (threat is the key word here).
First, to anyone who has ever watched Fox Soccer Channel, you know all too well that their issues do not need to be explained. But if you haven't, it's important to note that, as stated above, most of Fox Soccer Channel's viewership comes from its rebroadcasting of UEFA Champions League fixtures on weekdays and Sky's English Premier League telecasts on weekends. This programming conveniently starts to wind down for the season just as the MLS season begins, and likewise, the MLS season starts to wind down just as EPL and UEFA action begins to pick up again. So everything is in harmony at Fox, in a sense. If one of those cogs in MLS suddenly disappears, Fox has a serious problem. They've tried original programming a couple of times in the past (the most recent was Soccer Talk Live, a live show hosted by Union color commentator Kyle Martino, that, frankly, looked like it was being filmed for public access and had a lifespan of weeks, not months or years), and while 30-minute programs with UEFA highlights from the previous year provide decent entertainment, a TV channel they do not make. MLS is key to the continued success of Fox Soccer Channel.
While for many months it appeared Versus was highly interested in legitimately bidding, Ourand reports that, to this point, there hasn't been much more than preliminary talks between the Comcast-owned station and the league. To be sure, a deal with Versus would have be a boon for a league that is struggling to provide a legitimate image of itself to the American people. It is certainly still possible, of course, that the two sides will be able to come to terms, and we will weigh the effect a potential deal would have on both sides in a future installment of this series. Either way, MLS can use and twist Versus's interest, even if minimal, to help force Fox basically bid against itself and drive up yearly its promised yearly royalties to MLS.
So where does this leave Major League Soccer from a national television perspective? With two partners in ESPN and Univision who are becoming more and more disappointed in the ratings of their MLS telecasts with each passing year (but don't appear to be terribly upset about it -- American soccer is a big deal for both networks and both recognize it as a long-term investment) and a third partner in Fox Soccer Channel who provides sub-par coverage to MLS fans and is also disappointed with ratings, and is now potentially on the brink of not showing MLS telecasts for the first time since 2003. Hmph. Up next in this series, we will discuss the state of local television coverage of MLS. I'll give you a bit of a preview: things look kind of similar -- not terrible by any stretch, but at the same time not all roses.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This whole situation basically makes or breaks Garber’s reign. Many people in the soccer world believe that Garber has built the MLS into this amiable position of finally getting recognition in the US as a major sports league. Now he has to put the finishing touches on his legacy, which will undoubtedly come from the result of his faux-bidding war between Versus and FSC. If he succeeds in not only bringing in more money to the league but also getting more recognition and PR for the league it will be the cementing of his notoriety as the man who built American soccer.
This isn’t all about the MLS, it’s also about Garber’s ego. At least it is to me.
Managing Editor for Brotherly Game, SBNation's Philadelphia Union blog and contributor for SBN Philly. // @scottdkessler
"College is only 4 years, but the Eagles are for life." - Ironhank
Can we get some discussion about online viewing options in this series as well? I’m a non-cable subscriber who watches games mostly online(MLS Matchday and ESPN3) and plan on continuing that.
by danielfarrell on Jan 1, 2011 9:31 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Yeah, I was going to bring that area up in the next segment (hopefully for late this upcoming week or early in the following week) because I think the main topic of interest is MLS MatchDay and DirectKick for watching regional broadcasts. And I think there will be some interesting discussion in the latter two segments of the series about how MLS’s ultimate end-goal for US TV broadcasting affects their online strategy. Incredibly, ESPN3 has almost become mainstream, but in reality MLS controls nothing about it, just like the NBA, EPL, etc. and it’s sort of like an added bonus ESPN’s partners get.
Contributor at The Brotherly Game, SBN's Philadelphia Union blog
The addition of ESPN3 to the slate of options for Xbox Live users is also something to ponder as part of the discussion.
Managing Editor for Brotherly Game, SBNation's Philadelphia Union blog and contributor for SBN Philly. // @scottdkessler
"College is only 4 years, but the Eagles are for life." - Ironhank
by Scott Kessler on Jan 1, 2011 1:14 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
NBC / Comcast
The Versus conversation with MLS is interesting especially when you add in the upcoming NBC deal. Now you have another large national sports network (Fox, ESPN/ABC, CBS/Viacom, Comcast/NBC) being created that is looking to enhance their programming. Soccer is a growth market especially if you can get EPL, La Liga or Champions League games (larger US market than MLS currently). So MLS should be in a good position to get a better deal which means more money to MLS (more money for better players) & hopefully a better product on the field (I like the current product but it would be nice to see more quality in the league).
Online is part of this because the broadcaster with the TV rights will probably have the online rights as well. Or you go direct to the league to get access either way you will have to pay. ESPN3 looks like it is free but the ISP pays for access not customer.
Great discussion thanks for looking into this.
Welcome to the site, hope you’ll find it to your liking. I’m leaving this discussion to Ben because he’s much better at this business stuff than I am.
Managing Editor for Brotherly Game, SBNation's Philadelphia Union blog and contributor for SBN Philly. // @scottdkessler
"College is only 4 years, but the Eagles are for life." - Ironhank
by Scott Kessler on Jan 2, 2011 2:28 PM EST up reply actions
Really appreciative of the comment, and welcome to the site. Completely agree that MLS should be in a decent position in these negotiations, and hopefully they’ll remember that and not get backed into a corner with a bad deal.
Contributor at The Brotherly Game, SBN's Philadelphia Union blog

by 















